Latest Article Get our latest posts by subscribing this site

Mempolitikkan Agama

Politik agama sama-sama menguntungkan yang menyerang dan yang diserang dan sama-sama merugi juga. Politik agama bisa dimulai dari korban yang memancing serangan, agar dapat diuntungkan. Atau dimulai dari penyerang untuk merugikan korban. Cara yang pertama yang sulit dilihat. Semua Negara, Ideologi dan Parpol Mempolitikkan Agama... Baca Di Sini

Kristenisme Dalam Politik AS

Jumat, 20 September 2013

Apakah Amerika Serikat telah berubah menjadi negara agama???

Jawabannya lihat di sini: Rise Of Faith Within GOP Has Created America's First Religious Party


It's time for the pancake breakfast in the basement meeting hall of St. Peter's Catholic Church in this faded but proud industrial city on the Ohio River. It's Sunday morning before the 11 o'clock mass, and as swarms of kids dig into their syrupy meals, the parents talk politics and religion.

"This country is in trouble and has to get back to the Christian values it was founded on," says Tracy McManamon, an insurance salesman. "We can't be afraid to talk about it. We have to speak up."

Later, upstairs in the sanctuary, Father Ray Ryland echoes that sentiment. In his "prayer of the faithful," he hopes that elected officials will take a "pro-life" position on the issues of the day.

Rick Santorum plans to spend Super Tuesday evening in Steubenville High School, across the street from St. Peter's. The parishioners in the church on Sunday were uniform in their support, even if they acknowledged that he might never be president. "At least he's willing to say out loud what we all believe," said McManamon.

If Santorum hopes to stop Mitt Romney's fitful but effective slog to the GOP nomination, the former Pennsylvania senator will need a massive turnout from church basements and sanctuaries such as these. But whether he wins or loses is almost beside the point. Santorum's unexpected and, in some ways, astonishing rise from semi-obscurity is symbolic of something far more important in politics.

Whatever happens on Super Tuesday, the Republican primary season already has made history. The contest has confirmed the establishment of America's first overtly religious major political party.

The signs are numerous, but it's still easy to miss the big picture: that the GOP now is best understood as the American Faith Party (AFP) and its members as conservative Judeo-Christian-Mormon Republicans. The basement of St. Peter's is just one clubhouse.


"There has never been anything like it in our history," said Princeton historian Sean Wilentz. "'God's Own Party' now really is just that."

The new GOP does not seem to be sitting well with the American people as a whole, or even with many traditional Republicans. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine is only the latest non-AFP-type Republican to decide to leave politics and/or the party. In the new ruling class, "revival tent" proponents are driving out the old "big tent" advocates. And a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows that 40 percent of American adults think less of the party after watching its transformation this electoral season.

The American Faith Party is a doctrinally schizophrenic coalition bound by faith in the power of biblical values to create a better country; by fear of federal power, especially that of the federal courts and President Barack Obama and his administration; and by fear of rising Islamic political power around the world.

The AFP unites Catholic traditionalists who especially revere the papal hierarchy; evangelical, fundamentalist and charismatic Protestants; some strands of Judaism, including those ultra-orthodox on social issues and Jews for whom an Israel with biblical borders and a capital in Jerusalem is a spiritual imperative, not just a matter of diplomatic balance in the Middle East; and Mormons, who ironically aren't regarded as Christians by most other members of the coalition. Romney, a devout Mormon, is their man.

The four still-standing Republican presidential candidates are all AFP members in good standing on most of the party's key agenda items. The GOP platform is sure to feature all of them, including opposition to abortion and gay marriage; measures to counter what Republicans regard as attacks on religious liberty; expressions of fear about the extent of federal power, especially from the courts, on social and medical issues; libertarian economic policies that limit regulation and taxes (for religious conservatives and economic libertarians share a common enemy: government); denunciations of Islamic political power; and support for Israel. (Ron Paul is a dissenter on the last two points.)

All the candidates, including Paul, adhere to the AFP's central operational tenet: that professing your own faith -- once verboten in American politics -- is a necessary precondition to being taken seriously.

In the American Faith Party, in other words, every day begins with a prayer breakfast, a public ritual that used to occur only once a year.

Religious parties are familiar phenomena in most of the world. Europe has Christian Democrats in every country. Egypt has the Muslim Brotherhood. But the Bill of Rights ban on the establishment of religion and religious tests pushed American parties away from such overt identification. Historians say that never before has the U.S. had a party whose central identity and avowed cause was the profession of religious faith in politics.

A generation in the making and like the original Republican Party it has supplanted, the AFP is the product of a fundamental moral conflict -- in this case, over the relative roles of church and state, and over the role of religion in guiding public policy.

Ronald Reagan began the process a generation ago, reaching out to evangelical, Bible Belt Protestants, who had shied away from politics ever since the Scopes "Monkey Trial" in Tennessee in the 1920s. In Reagan's case, the motivating force was the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision supporting a woman's right to an abortion, which led Catholics to ally themselves with conservative Protestants.

To be sure, there have been other avowedly religious presidential candidates in recent years, among them Pat Robertson, a televangelist, in 1988 and Mike Huckabee, a preacher in his spare time, in 2008.

But never before has the entire party essentially been singing from the hymnal. Candidates in 2012 who did not do so, such as Jon Huntsman and Herman Cain, went nowhere; implausible entrants such as Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry went further than they would have in an earlier era of the Republican Party.

As seen from strongholds such as Steubenville, the new party is built in equal measure on hope and fear. Its leaders and adherents deny their goal is theocracy and say they only want religious freedoms protected and an acknowledgement that biblical faith and morals were central to the founders' vision of America -- and must be central again if America is to survive at all.

There's enough resonance to their concern about the secularization of American culture to give their grievances credibility and even populist nobility. "When they frame their cause in terms of religious liberty, that's something that Americans agree with," said Wilentz. "That approach creates an inspiring sense of mission."

According to historians, the closest entity akin to the new AFP was the anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant Know-Nothing Party of the early 19th century. "They were all Protestants, but they were entirely about what they were against, not what they were for," said author and historian Michael Beschloss. The Prohibition and civil rights movements were church-based, but their objectives weren't per se religious, said Wilentz.

To the parishioners of St. Peter's in Steubenville, this history is beside the point. Their point is that government alone can and will never nourish the proper regard for the sanctity of life, the dignity of humanity and the role of faith in creating moral character that Americans need to govern themselves in a democracy.

"We can't ever think that a fetus is somehow undesirable or even disposable," said Justine Schmiesing, a mother of seven who noted that she does not "contracept." "We don't want government to act in ways that ignore life, and that is why we are speaking up."

Islamisme AS dan Obama di Myanmar

Obama Desak Myanmar Hentikan Pembantaian Muslim

Presiden Barack Obama mendesak presiden Myanmar pada Senin, 20 Mei 2013, untuk menghentikan kekerasan terhadap minoritas Muslim di negara itu. Pada kesempatan yang sama, ia memuji reformasi ekonomi dan politik di negara yang sebelumnya dikucilkan itu.

Ia menyatakan hal itu saat menerima Presiden Myanmar Thein Sein. Kunjungan ini adalah yang pertama ke Gedung Putih dalam 47 tahun oleh pemimpin negara di Asia Tenggara itu.

"Saya juga berbagi dengan Presiden Sein tentang keprihatinan kami yang mendalam tentang kekerasan komunal atas komunitas Muslim di Myanmar. Perpindahan orang, kekerasan yang ditujukan terhadap mereka perlu berhenti," kata Obama.  Obama menyeruhkan diakhirinya pembunuhan Muslim Rohingya di negara bagian Rakhine di bagian barat Myanmar.

Presiden Myanmar berjanji untuk menyelesaikan konflik etnis dan membawa pelaku ke pengadilan. Setidaknya 192 orang tewas tahun lalu dalam aksi kekerasan antara umat Buddha di Rakhine dan Muslim Rohingya, yang ditolak oleh warga Myanmar. Sebanyak 140.000 orang yang kehilangan tempat tinggal dalam serangan adalah Muslim.

Obama mengatakan pemimpin Myanmar telah meyakinkannya bahwa ia akan membebaskan para tahanan politik dan melembagakan reformasi politik yang sudah mulai mengubah wajah negara itu dan mengakhiri kerenggangannya dengan Barat. Pejabat Amerika Serikat mengatakan bahwa reformasi oleh Myanmar - antara lain dengan membebaskan aktivis demokrasi Aung San Suu Kyi dan ratusan tahanan politik, memperlonggar sensor, legalisasi serikat buruh dan unjuk rasa - yang transformatif pantas mendapatkan dukungan.

Dalam pidatonya di AS, Thein Sein menguraikan upayanya untuk memajukan negaranya yang kini menjadi negara termiskin di Asia Tenggara itu. Sejumlah langkah yang dilakukan antara lain merombak lembaga warisan rezim lama, menghapus model pemerintahan otoriter, dan membangun identitas nasional baru yang inklusif dari puluhan kelompok etnis.

"Untuk mencapai semua ini kita membutuhkan dukungan maksimal internasional, termasuk dari Amerika Serikat, untuk melatih dan mendidik, berbagi pengetahuan, perdagangan dan investasi, dan mendorong orang lain melakukan hal yang sama," katanya.

Soal pembantaian Muslim, ia menyatakan pemerintahnya "harus memastikan tidak hanya kekerasan antar-komunal terhenti, tapi itu semua pelaku dibawa ke pengadilan."

More

Religion and Intolerance in Contemporary American Politics

In a 2008 report from the Pew Research Center on religion in American life, one of the principal findings had to do with the tolerance believers extend to those affiliated with other religious denominations and sects. The New York Times hailed these findings with the headline, “Survey Shows U.S. Religious Tolerance.” The article goes on to note that 70 percent of Americans affiliated with a religion agree that “many religions can lead to eternal life.” From this frame of reference, tolerance seems to predominate in the contemporary United States.

While the conclusions of that study are on their own terms believable, they ought not be taken to mean that religionists have a propensity toward tolerance more generally.

More

Judge backs U.S. right to seize Manhattan building allegedly controlled by Iran


The United States is set to seize control of a midtown Manhattan skyscraper prosecutors claim is secretly owned by Iran, the U.S. justice department said, though the ruling is to be appealed, AFP reported.

According to the report, a federal judge ruled in favor of the government's legal case this week, claiming that the 36-storey Piaget Building's owners had violated Iran sanctions and money laundering laws.

Manhattan Federal Prosecutor Preet Bharara said the decision upheld the justice department claims that the owner of the building "was (and is) a front for Bank Melli, and thus a front for the Government of Iran".

Prosecutors allege that the building's owners, the Alavi Foundation and Assa Corporation, transferred rental income and other funds to Iran's state-owned Bank Melli.

Alavi also ran a charitable organization for Iran and managed the building for the Iranian government, the statement said.

Built in the 1970s by a non-profit organization operated by the Shah of Iran - and financed with a Bank Melli loan - the building was expropriated by the new Iranian government after the 1979 revolution, prosecutors allege.

The U.S. Treasury Department has instituted tight sanctions against Iran, blacklisting a number of Iranian companies and organizations and putting very tight controls on the ability of any group or business to transfer funds into Iran.

The restrictions seek to pressure Tehran into giving up what the West claims is a program to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Iran denies.


More

Kristenisme Dalam Dunia Politik

Kristenisme saat ini sudah menjadi aliran politik. Politik kristenisme banyak dipraktekkan oleh partai-partai politik di Amerika Serikat, khususnya oleh kalangan Partai Republik.

Lihat pengertiannya di sini.

This morning a friend sent me a definition of Christianist from The Urban Dictionary

Christianist*

1. Christianist
One who claims to be a follower of Christ and His teachings but who actively engages in acts and deeds that are contrary to His teachings.
A pastor who calls for the murder of someone whose political beliefs are disagreeable to him (or her) is a Christianist, not a Christian.

2. Christianist
A member, or members of the Christian religion that uses it as a negative weapon against a person, or an entire group of people.
An anti-gay Christianist group, NOM, believes they're protecting marriage by banning gay marriage.

3. Christianist
A member of the Christian faith who seeks to use a religion of peace and tolerance for political and personal gain.
Pat Robertson and his band of Christianists are doing everything they can to keep the Republicans in power.
*Definitions from the Urban Dictionary


Perhaps Rep.Akin fits this definition. This sort of thinking escapes the NTS category. While I struggle with the distinction, I find I must believe that there is a difference between Christians and Christianists.

Hindu: Agama Diharapkan Menuntun Kehidupan Politik

Di dalam bangun kerangka kehidupan manusia, paling tidak ada dua instrumen utama, menjadi sumber enersi dan jalan manusia, untuk menjadi tumpuan perjungannya. Baik perjuangan tujuan hidup perseorangan, kelompok, komunitas, lembaga dan organisasi massa, maupun lainnya. Konsep kesejahteraan lahir bathin di dalam agama Hindu disebutkan dengan idiom, ‘’Moksartam Jagaddhita’. Ini dimaksudkan sebagai tujuan utama kehidupan, baik menyangkut rohani maupun jasmani yang berdasarkan dharma.

Agama dan politik berpengaruh, apabila disadari dan diperankan dengan sadar, disiplin dijalankan olah manusia tersebut. Seperti kesejahtraan rohani membawa kesejukan hati, yang menyebar ke dalam masyarakat, sehingga akan mendorong suasana kedamaian. Dalam suasana damai, kesejahteraan materi menjadi lebih mudah terpenuhi.

Rasa damai membuat orang bekerja dan berusaha dengan nyaman. Mendorong terwujudnya kesejahtraan materi semakin meluas dan berkwalitas. Suasana ini bukan mustahil mendorong dan lebih mendekatkan pada terwujudnya, moksartam jagaddhitam.

Sumber
 
Support : Your Link | Your Link | Your Link
Copyright © 2013. The Politics of Religion - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger